Skip to main content
D. Hawaii· 7/5/2018

Amina v. WMC Fin. Co.

Citations

  • 329 F. Supp. 3d 1141

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that claim preclusion barred “[s]everal newly label or reformulated claims that have simply repackaged [the plaintiff's] prior attack....”
  • “A publicly recorded document provides constructive notice where the document itself constitutes evidence of the fraud.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Watson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.