Webster Salasker Lucas v. Department of Corrections California Men's Colony-West

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that courts must give a pro se plaintiff 7 leave to amend “[u]nless it is absolutely clear that no amendment can cure the defect” in 8 the complaint
• holding that dismissal of a pro se complaint without leave to amend is proper only if it is clear that the deficiencies of the complaint could not be cured by amendment
• holding that when a court dismisses a pro se plaintiff’s 7 complaint, it must give the plaintiff leave to amend “[u]nless it is absolutely clear 8 that no amendment can cure the defect” in the complaint
• holding that when a court dismisses a pro se plaintiff’s complaint, it must give the 1 plaintiff leave to amend “[u]nless it is absolutely clear that no amendment can cure the 2 defect” in the complaint
• holding that when a court dismisses a pro se plaintiff’s 9 complaint, it must give the plaintiff leave to amend “[u]nless it is absolutely clear 10 that no amendment can cure the defect” in the complaint
• holding that when a court dismisses a pro se plaintiff’s 9 complaint, it must give the plaintiff leave to amend “[u]nless it is absolutely clear 10 that no amendment can cure the defect” in the complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).