Sergio Ramirez v. County of San Bernardino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if Plaintiff has already filed one amendment as a matter of course he 7 must seek consent to file another
• holding that a plaintiff may 12 choose to amend their complaint the first time by stipulation, thereby saving the plaintiff’s 13 as-a-matter-of-course amendment for later in the litigation
• reasoning that the ability to amend under Rule 15(a)(1) is not 6 “exhausted or waived once a 15(a)(2) amendment is made”
• stating that an “amended complaint supersedes the original, the latter being treated thereafter as non-existent” (cleaned up)
• stating that Rule 15(a)(1)(B) allows a Plaintiff to “amend once within twenty-one 8 || days after service” of a motion under Rule 12(b)(6)
• finding that plaintiffs “may amend in whatever order” of method they see fit if 16 it is timely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).