· 5/29/2003
State v. Wukawitz
Citations
- 662 N.W.2d 517
- 2003 Minn. LEXIS 284
- 2003 WL 21231999
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that plea withdrawal should be the first option, but if the state would be unduly prejudiced by withdrawal, the district court may modify the sentence
- holding that a district court may allow a defendant to withdraw a plea “in those limited circumstances where imposition of a conditional-release term after sentencing would violate the plea agreement”
- \Our holding is limited to those situations where the original sentence did not include conditional release and the imposition of such a term after the fact would violate the plea agreement.\
- “Our holding is limited to those situations where the original sentence did not include conditional release and the imposition of such a term after the fact would violate the plea agreement.”
- conditional release “cannot begin pri- or to the inmate’s release from prison”
- \The period of supervised release is typically one-third of the original pronounced sentence.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blatz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.