Skip to main content
· 5/29/2003

State v. Wukawitz

Citations

  • 662 N.W.2d 517
  • 2003 Minn. LEXIS 284
  • 2003 WL 21231999

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plea withdrawal should be the first option, but if the state would be unduly prejudiced by withdrawal, the district court may modify the sentence
  • holding that a district court may allow a defendant to withdraw a plea “in those limited circumstances where imposition of a conditional-release term after sentencing would violate the plea agreement”
  • \Our holding is limited to those situations where the original sentence did not include conditional release and the imposition of such a term after the fact would violate the plea agreement.\
  • “Our holding is limited to those situations where the original sentence did not include conditional release and the imposition of such a term after the fact would violate the plea agreement.”
  • conditional release “cannot begin pri- or to the inmate’s release from prison”
  • \The period of supervised release is typically one-third of the original pronounced sentence.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blatz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.