Cruger v. Love

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing Fla. Slat. Ann. §§ 395.011(9) (recodified as Fla. Stat. Ann. § 395.0191(8)), 766.101(5)
• “Virtually all of the information considered during the peer review process originates from outside sources.”
• “[Committee participants] can be compelled to state what they actually know to be true, but they cannot say whether they disclosed this same information to a board or committee.”
• peer review privilege is \intended to prohibit the chilling effect of the potential public disclosure of statements made to or information prepared for and used by the committee in carrying out its peer-review function\
• applications for staff privileges were \considered\ and therefore shielded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).