Supreme Court of Florida· 4/23/1992
Cruger v. Love
Citations
- 599 So. 2d 111
- 1992 WL 80103
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing Fla. Slat. Ann. §§ 395.011(9) (recodified as Fla. Stat. Ann. § 395.0191(8)), 766.101(5)
- “Virtually all of the information considered during the peer review process originates from outside sources.”
- “[Committee participants] can be compelled to state what they actually know to be true, but they cannot say whether they disclosed this same information to a board or committee.”
- peer review privilege is \intended to prohibit the chilling effect of the potential public disclosure of statements made to or information prepared for and used by the committee in carrying out its peer-review function\
- applications for staff privileges were \considered\ and therefore shielded
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Grimes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-08-12· cited 184×
- West Florida Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. SeeSupreme Court of Florida· 2012-01-12· cited 93×
- Alexander v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-10-14· cited 88×
- Memorial Hospital-The Woodlands v. McCownTexas Supreme Court· 1996-07-12· cited 84×
- Florida Hosp. Waterman, Inc. v. BusterSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-03-06· cited 68×
- Irving Healthcare System v. BrooksTexas Supreme Court· 1996-07-12· cited 62×
- Babcock v. Bridgeport HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-28· cited 40×
- Claypool v. MladineoMississippi Supreme Court· 1998-12-10· cited 38×
- McGee Ex Rel. Estate of McGee v. Bruce Hospital SystemSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-12-13· cited 36×
- St. Joseph Medical Center, Inc. v. Cardiac Surgery Associates, P.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-04-12· cited 34×
- Ex Parte KrothapalliSupreme Court of Alabama· 2000-02-18· cited 27×
- Ex Parte AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama· 2000-12-22· cited 27×
- Durham v. VinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-09-13· cited 24×
- State ex rel. Charles Town General Hospital v. SandersWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2001-11-09· cited 22×
- Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. v. Eighth Judicial DistrictNevada Supreme Court· 1997-04-24· cited 21×
- Ex Parte QureshiSupreme Court of Alabama· 2000-04-07· cited 17×
- Young v. SaldanhaWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1993-04-23· cited 16×
- Director of Health Affairs Policy Planning v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-08-25· cited 16×
- Stratienko v. CHATTANOOGA-HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITYTennessee Supreme Court· 2007-05-14· cited 15×
- Beverly Enterprises-Florida, Inc. v. IvesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-08· cited 14×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Holly v. AuldSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-05-03· cited 735×
- Byrd v. Richardson-Greenshields Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-10-26· cited 147×
- Sanderson v. Frank S. Bryan, M.D., Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-03-23· cited 45×
- Devin v. City of HollywoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-07-23· cited 42×
- White v. Pepsico, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-09-06· cited 33×
- Feldman v. GlucroftSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-02-04· cited 20×
- Dworkin v. St. Francis Hospital, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware· 1986-10-03· cited 12×
- TARPON SPRINGS GENERAL HOSP. v. HudakDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-02-16· cited 7×
- Love v. CrugerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-31· cited 5×
- Jacksonville Medical Center, Inc. v. AkersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-27· cited 3×
- Parrado v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-04-09· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.