· 11/3/1995
Homart Development Co. v. County of Hennepin
Citations
- 538 N.W.2d 907
- 1995 Minn. LEXIS 917
- 1995 WL 643918
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “day” means a 24-hour period “unless expressly qualified or limited”
- refusing to engraft upon a tax statute a requirement that is contrary to the language of the statute and the intention of the legislature
- refusing to engraft upon a tax statute a requirement that is contrary to the language of the statute and the intention of the legislature
- if a statute is free from ambiguity, courts look only at a statute's plain meaning
- if a statute is free from ambiguity, courts look only at a statute’s plain meaning
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.