Skip to main content

Alvarez v. State

Citations

  • 605 S.W.2d 615
  • 1980 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a trial court may enter a nunc pro tunc order to correct a clerical error in a judgment
  • noting that a judgment nunc pro tunc is the appropriate avenue to make a correction when the court’s records do not mirror the judgment that was actually rendered
  • noting that a judgment nunc pro tunc is the appropriate avenue to make a correction when the court’s records do not mirror the judgment that was actually rendered
  • noting that a judgment nunc pro tunc is the appropriate avenue to make a correction when the court’s records do not mirror the judgment that was actually rendered
  • holding erroneous recitation judgment entered in Criminal District Court Number Three could be corrected nunc pro tunc as clerical error to reflect judgment entered in Criminal District Court Number Two six months after entry of final judgment
  • holding erroneous recitation judgment entered in Criminal District Court Number Three could be corrected nunc pro tunc as clerical error to reflect judgment entered in Criminal District Court Number Two six months after entry of final judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

114 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Alvarez v. State

154 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.