Skip to main content
· 6/14/1978

Mathes v. Kelton

Citations

  • 569 S.W.2d 876
  • 21 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 424
  • 1978 Tex. LEXIS 361

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • judgment nunc pro tunc that changed party entitled to possession of personal property “materially altered the substance” of prior order and “[could] not be validly accomplished”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chadick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.