Skip to main content

Alvarez v. State

Citations

  • 515 So. 2d 286
  • 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2460

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when consent is relied on as the justification for a search, the State must prove such con sent was freely and voluntarily given and not in mere acquiescence to police authority
  • when consent is relied on as justification for a search, state must prove that such consent was voluntary and not mere acquiescence to police authority
  • partially blocking suspect's sole exit from train compartment was one factor indicating that a detention had occurred
  • partially blocking suspect’s sole exit from train compartment was one factor indicating that a detention had occurred
  • partially blocking suspect's sole exit from train compartment was one factor indicating that a detention had occurred
  • no valid consent is established unless state can show, by clear and convincing evidence, an unequivocal break in the chain of illegality between the prior unlawful detention and the purported consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anstead

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.