Alvarez v. State
Citations
- 50 Fla. 24
Syllabus
<p>CONDITIONAL PARDONS — EFFECT OF VIOLATION OF CONDITION — PROCEDURE UPON VIOLATION OF PARDON-REVOCATION OF PARDON.</p> <p>1. The law is settled that, where a criminal accepts a pardon, he accepts it subject to all its valid conditions and limitar tions, and will be held bound to a compliance therewith..</p> <p>2. Where a conditional pardon has been granted and accepted, and the convict has fulfilled the conditions thereof, the effect of the pardon becomes the same as though it were by its terms full and absolute.</p> <p>.3. Before delivery and acceptance a pardon may be revoked by the officer or body granting it; but if the pardon is not void in its inception, it cannot be revoked for any cause after 'its delivery and acceptance are complete, for then it has passed beyond the control of the officer or body who granted it, and becomes a valid and operative act, of the benefits of which its recipient can be deprived only in some appropriate legal proceeding.</p> <p>4. Where a prisoner has accepted a conditional pardon and has been released from imprisonment by virtue thereof, but has violated or failed to perform the conditions or any of them, the pardon, in case of a condition precedent, does not take effect, and in case of a condition subsequent, becomes void, and the criminal may thereupon be re-arrested and compelled to undergo the punishment imposed by his original sentence, or as much thereof as he had not suffered at the time of his release.</p> <p>6. Sometimes conditional pardons expressly provide that, upon violation of the condition, the offender shall be liable to summary arrest and recommitment for the unexpired portion of his original sentence. Such stipulations upon acceptance of the pardon become binding upon the convict and authorize his' re-arrest and recommitment upon the terms imposed, and authorize such arrest and recommitment In the manner and by or through the official authority as stipulated In the pardon.</p> <p>6. Where a convict has been re
Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Parkhil, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court· 1951-03-21· cited 69×
- Ex Parte MedleyIdaho Supreme Court· 1953-02-17· cited 44×
- State v. HorneSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-06-15· cited 44×
- In re PattersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1915-03-06· cited 30×
- Marsh v. GarwoodSupreme Court of Florida· 1953-05-08· cited 29×
- Ex parte LuceroNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1917-11-12· cited 27×
- State v. MorettiNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1958-05-19· cited 26×
- Turner v. WainwrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-01-16· cited 15×
- Spencer v. KeesWashington Supreme Court· 1907-10-08· cited 15×
- Ex Parte CollinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1925-10-10· cited 14×
- Caston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1952-03-07· cited 13×
- State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1924-03-21· cited 13×
- Richard Lee Morgan v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary of the Dept. Of Offender Rehabilitation and Jim Smith, Attorney General of the State of FloridaEleventh Circuit· 1982-05-17· cited 12×
- Bowers v. DishongFifth Circuit· 1939-04-28· cited 12×
- United States Ex Rel. Brazier v. CommissionerSecond Circuit· 1924-12-15· cited 12×
- Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-01-15· cited 10×
- Kirkpatrick v. HollowellSupreme Court of Iowa· 1923-12-14· cited 10×
- Murphy v. LawhonMississippi Supreme Court· 1952-03-03· cited 9×
- State ex rel. Bailey v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida· 1953-04-17· cited 5×
- Fleenor v. HammondW.D. Kentucky· 1939-08-10· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.