Alvarez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding it was fundamental error to convict the defendant of the crime of carjacking when the victim was unaware of the theft — an element of the offense
• “Here, ... the victim was unaware of the theft. We conclude, as we did in that case, that under these circumstances the [Legislature did not intend for a carjacking conviction to lie.”
• “Here, . . . the victim was unaware of the theft. We conclude, as we did in that case, that under these circumstances the [L]egislature did not intend for a carjacking conviction to lie.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• William James Deparvine v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2014-04-24· cited 21×
• Andre v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-05-20· cited 6×
• William James Deparvine v. State of Florida – Revised Opinion
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2014-08-28

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blakely v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
• State v. DiGuilio
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
• State v. Law
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-07-27· cited 545×
• Lynch v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1974-03-13· cited 390×
• F.B. v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-07-11· cited 200×
• Beasley v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-10-26· cited 113×
• Sorey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-09-28· cited 47×
• Tirko v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-03-01· cited 34×
• Luton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-09· cited 22×
• Flores v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-03· cited 6×