Alvarez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• use of police informer and undercover agent on opposite sides of an illegal drug transaction did not establish entrapment as a matter of law
• use of police informer and undercover agent on opposite sides of an illegal drug transaction did not establish entrapment as a matter of law
• supreme court implicitly found bias based on jurors’ prior exposure to a state’s witness absent the state’s showing corroboration for that witness’ testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Dobbs
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-06-15· cited 39×
• Baca v. State
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1987-09-14· cited 33×
• State v. Wiberg
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-03-17· cited 29×
• State v. Pierce
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1990-02-27· cited 22×
• State v. Baca
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-11-20· cited 21×
• State v. Kiernan
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1998-07-22· cited 3×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Steve Casias v. United States
  Tenth Circuit· 1963-02-28· cited 41×
• Mares v. State
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1971-11-11· cited 35×