Supreme Court of Delaware· 11/12/1992
Gregory v. State
Citations
- 616 A.2d 1198
- 1992 Del. LEXIS 476
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the elements of the crime of possession with intent to deliver “require no proof of conduct involving lying, deceiving, cheating, stealing or defrauding”
- concluding that the elements of the crime of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver “require no proof of conduct involving lying, deceiving, cheating, stealing or defrauding”
- determining that drug-related offenses, such as possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, do not involve dishonesty and thus do not relate to credibility
- rejecting reasoning similar to that applied by the trial court in the present case
- “the dual purpose of the rule is to protect the privacy of the resident as well as to reduce the possibility of danger to the officers and citizens alike.”
- “[P]ast convictions for narcotics offenses created a substantial risk that the jury would draw the character inference, forbidden by D.R.E. 404(b
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Veasey, Moore, Holland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2001-08-10· cited 115×
- Lopez-Vazquez v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-08-29· cited 105×
- State v. WallerTennessee Supreme Court· 2003-10-30· cited 95×
- Woody v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2001-01-24· cited 84×
- Seward v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1999-01-22· cited 66×
- State v. GiddensCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-06-10· cited 50×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2002-05-09· cited 50×
- State v. Al-AminCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-03-03· cited 37×
- West v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-04-30· cited 29×
- Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1993-10-01· cited 25×
- Cole v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2005-10-20· cited 21×
- Webb v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1995-07-12· cited 20×
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1996-02-22· cited 18×
- Robinson v. Paul Ray Taylor, M.D.Utah Supreme Court· 2015-08-11· cited 18×
- Sullins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2007-07-23· cited 12×
- Fulp v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-02-03· cited 11×
- Cole v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2007-03-12· cited 9×
- Archie v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1998-12-29· cited 4×
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1997-06-02· cited 4×
- Hull v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2005-12-14· cited 3×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-06-10· cited 3,146×
- Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1986-02-21· cited 430×
- United States v. Mohammad Reza MehrmaneshNinth Circuit· 1982-10-05· cited 212×
- Getz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1988-02-29· cited 204×
- United States v. Jesus OrtizSecond Circuit· 1977-04-11· cited 109×
- United States v. David T. LewisD.C. Circuit· 1980-03-03· cited 97×
- United States v. Zack O'Farrell HastingsEighth Circuit· 1978-06-12· cited 48×
- Alston v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1989-02-09· cited 26×
- Tatman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1974-05-01· cited 24×
- Marvel v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1972-03-30· cited 23×
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1975-07-17· cited 20×
- Dyton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1969-01-16· cited 16×
- Dunfee v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1975-09-30· cited 16×
- Bartley v. DavisSupreme Court of Delaware· 1986-12-22· cited 13×
- Potts v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1983-03-11· cited 13×
- Poe v. PoeSuperior Court of Delaware· 1975-01-24· cited 12×
- Waller v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1978-11-06· cited 9×
- Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1980-06-25· cited 9×
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1975-10-07· cited 9×
- Green v. Shearson Lehman/American Express, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1985-12-09· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.