Supreme Court of Delaware· 6/16/2009
Norman v. State
Citations
- 976 A.2d 843
- 2009 Del. LEXIS 306
- 2009 WL 1676828
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that one factor that must be present to trigger collateral estoppel is that “the prior action has been finally adjudicated on the merits”
- finding that facts obtained from an independent source can be admitted even if those facts were first obtained illegally
- applying the independent source doctrine to evidence obtained in violation of the defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights
- admitting defendant’s statements taken in violation of his right to counsel under the inevitable discovery doctrine
- discussing the federal inevitable discovery exception and independent source doctrine
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steele, Holland, Berger, Jacobs, Ridgely
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cooke v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-07-21· cited 132×
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Delaware· 2012-06-28· cited 21×
- Wescott v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-10-13· cited 3×
- Peterson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2013-11-13· cited 3×
- State v. RoneSuperior Court of Delaware· 2018-09-17
- State v. DryburghSuperior Court of Delaware· 2019-04-30
- State v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Delaware· 2019-12-18
- State v. BlackwoodSuperior Court of Delaware· 2020-02-27
- Laws v. HandySuperior Court of Delaware· 2020-06-18
- JP-Richardson v. Pacific Oaks etc.California Court of Appeal· 2021-06-29
- State v. GarnettSuperior Court of Delaware· 2022-03-01
- Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. v. Nokia CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2023-01-31
- State v. WestSuperior Court of Delaware· 2023-08-14
- Garnett v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2023-10-24
- State v. TaylorSuperior Court of Delaware· 2023-11-28
- Global Discovery Biosciences Corporation v. Douglas S. HarringtonCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2023-12-01
- State v. AndersonSuperior Court of Delaware· 2024-04-05
- State v. MatthewsSuperior Court of Delaware· 2024-12-23
- Karen Callahan v. Joseph NelsonCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2025-11-14
- State v. Azofeifa-RamirezSuperior Court of Delaware· 2026-03-10
Cites
66 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1982-01-19· cited 3,271×
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 3,189×
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,080×
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 2,626×
- Zant v. StephensSupreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 2,410×
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1920-03-01· cited 2,373×
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court· 1981-05-18· cited 2,053×
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,034×
- Lewis v. JeffersSupreme Court· 1990-08-30· cited 1,972×
- Godfrey v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1980-05-19· cited 1,672×
- Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 1,569×
- Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-06-27· cited 1,424×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.