Alonzo v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a trial court's genuineness analysis, under Melbourne v. State , 679 So.2d 759 (Fla. 1996), may be implicit
• explaining that a trial court's genuineness analysis, under Melbourne v. State , 679 So.2d 759 (Fla. 1996), may be implicit
• “If the record fails to identify the respective race of the challenged and unchallenged jurors, the appellate court cannot determine if pretext exists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hayes v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2012-04-05· cited 43×
• King v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2012-02-09· cited 26×
• Martin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-02-07
• Hickman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-12-26

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Melbourne v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-09-05· cited 356×
• Rodriguez v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-02-03· cited 222×
• Hoskins v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-04-19· cited 80×
• Murray v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2009-01-30· cited 65×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-23· cited 49×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-25· cited 24×
• Fleming v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-09-12· cited 12×
• Bowden v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-15· cited 12×
• Heggan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-10· cited 11×
• Lidiano v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-24· cited 9×
• Watson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-09· cited 8×
• Carrillo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-08· cited 6×