Fleming v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, by overruling the defense’s objections, the trial court made an implicit finding that the State’s strikes were genuine
• concluding that, by overruling the defense's objections, the trial court made an implicit finding that the State's strikes were genuine
• stating that “we must conclude that, by overruling the defense’s objections, the lower court made an implicit finding that the state’s strikes were genuine.”
• finding that “by overruling the defense’s objections, the lower court made an implicit finding that the [S]tate’s strikes were genuine”
• reversing because the trial court erred in failing to determine the \genuineness of the challenges\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).