Skip to main content

Carrillo v. State

Citations

  • 962 So. 2d 1013
  • 2007 WL 2254532

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \the trial court implicitly underwent a genuineness inquiry and found the State's proffered reason to be non-pre-textual\
  • holding that \the trial court implicitly underwent a genuineness inquiry and found the State's proffered reason to be non-pre-textual\
  • finding the defense counsel’s statement, “Your Honor, I object. He’s a man. She wants to get more women on the jury,” sufficient to require an explanation of the strike
  • where trial court heard State’s gender-neutral explanation for strike, allowed defense counsel to argue its position, and then granted peremptory strike, trial court implicitly underwent a genuineness inquiry
  • where trial court heard State's gender-neutral explanation for strike, allowed defense counsel to argue its position, and then granted peremptory strike, trial court implicitly underwent a genuineness inquiry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ramirez, Rothenberg, and Lagoa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.