· 11/8/2013
Agosta v. Suffolk County
Citations
- 981 F. Supp. 2d 167
- 2013 WL 5960752
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160218
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ruling that to establish good cause, the moving party must show “that disclosure of the information will result in a ‘clearly defined and serious injury’” (internal citation omitted)
- “An overbroad Rule 30(b)(6) notice subjects the noticed party to an impossible task.”
- “An overbroad Rule 30(b)(6) notice subjects the noticed party to an impossible task.”
- “An overbroad Rule 30(b)(6) notice subjects the noticed party to an impossible task.”
- “An overbroad Rule 30(b)(6) notice subjects the noticed party to an impossible task.”
- “An overbroad Rule 30(b)(6) notice subjects the noticed party to an impossible task.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spatt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.