Skip to main content
· 11/8/2013

Agosta v. Suffolk County

Citations

  • 981 F. Supp. 2d 167
  • 2013 WL 5960752
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that to establish good cause, the moving party must show “that disclosure of the information will result in a ‘clearly defined and serious injury’” (internal citation omitted)
  • “An overbroad Rule 30(b)(6) notice subjects the noticed party to an impossible task.”
  • “An overbroad Rule 30(b)(6) notice subjects the noticed party to an impossible task.”
  • “An overbroad Rule 30(b)(6) notice subjects the noticed party to an impossible task.”
  • “An overbroad Rule 30(b)(6) notice subjects the noticed party to an impossible task.”
  • “An overbroad Rule 30(b)(6) notice subjects the noticed party to an impossible task.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.