Skip to main content
· 6/10/2003

Sussle v. Sirina Protection Systems Corp.

Citations

  • 269 F. Supp. 2d 285
  • 14 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1723
  • 199 A.L.R. Fed. 797
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9627
  • 2003 WL 21346935

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating, without explanation, that “[t]he Court finds that climbing stairs qualifies as a major life activity”
  • \The ADA prohibits retaliation against any individual who asserts rights under the ADA ... [including] when they seek a reasonable accommodation for their disability.\
  • “[T]he inability to walk long distances or to climb stairs does not in itself substantially limit an individual’s ability to perform a major life activity.”
  • “For mere temporal proximity to establish causality, the intervening period must be very close.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “[W]here an individual finds it difficult to concentrate only on occasion, his ability to concentrate is not substantially limited.”
  • “[C]ourts will not consider claims presented in such a questionnaire in determining the scope of an EEOC charge where the plaintiff signed and submitted an actual charge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Knapp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.