Second Circuit· 9/23/1998
Able v. United States
Citations
- 155 F.3d 628
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 23359
- 74 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,501
- 1998 WL 647142
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining courts afford great deference to laws that infringe on the rights of military personnel and noting this is atypical
- explaining courts afford great deference to laws that infringe on the rights of military personnel and noting this is atypical
- explaining courts afford great deference to laws that infringe on the rights of military personnel and noting this is atypical
- strict or intermediate scrutiny applies where “the subject of the different treatment is a member of a class that historically has been the object of discrimination.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feinberg, Leval, Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Civil Liberties for Urban Believers, Christ Center, Christian Covenant Outreach Church v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 2003-08-20· cited 289×
- Brown v. City Of OneontaSecond Circuit· 2000-08-08· cited 260×
- Varnum v. BrienSupreme Court of Iowa· 2009-04-03· cited 221×
- Frank D. Jones v. New York State Division of Military and Naval Affairs and New York State Army National GuardSecond Circuit· 1999-01-07· cited 185×
- Windsor v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 2012-10-18· cited 139×
- Quinn v. Nassau County Police DepartmentE.D. New York· 1999-06-28· cited 132×
- Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-10-28· cited 111×
- Cook v. GatesFirst Circuit· 2008-06-09· cited 86×
- Andersen v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court· 2006-07-26· cited 70×
- Ramos ex rel. Ramos v. Town of VernonSecond Circuit· 2003-06-02· cited 47×
- Log Cabin Republicans v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2011-09-29· cited 34×
- United States v. William T. Coleman, Beverly Holland and Roxanne M. StoweSecond Circuit· 1999-01-21· cited 26×
- Petrosky v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesN.D. New York· 1999-11-15· cited 24×
- Turley v. GiulianiS.D. New York· 2000-02-15· cited 21×
- Able v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1998-09-23· cited 19×
- Eiden v. McCarthyD. Connecticut· 2008-01-28· cited 18×
- Pedersen v. Office of Personnel ManagementD. Connecticut· 2012-07-31· cited 17×
- Ramos v. Town of VernonSecond Circuit· 2004-01-22· cited 16×
- Koffsky v. ApfelE.D. New York· 1998-11-16· cited 15×
- Brown v. City Of OneontaSecond Circuit· 1999-10-26· cited 13×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 7,112×
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 2,387×
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 2,199×
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court· 1974-06-19· cited 1,846×
- Romer v. EvansSupreme Court· 1996-06-03· cited 1,427×
- Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-13· cited 1,183×
- Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court· 1953-04-06· cited 957×
- United States v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1996-07-03· cited 930×
- Department of the Navy v. EganSupreme Court· 1988-02-23· cited 752×
- Greer v. SpockSupreme Court· 1976-03-24· cited 746×
- Burns v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1953-06-15· cited 669×
- Gillette v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-03-08· cited 603×
- Rostker v. GoldbergSupreme Court· 1981-06-25· cited 560×
- Palmore v. SidotiSupreme Court· 1984-04-25· cited 491×
- Goldman v. WeinbergerSupreme Court· 1986-03-25· cited 421×
- Loving v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 415×
- Brown v. GlinesSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 275×
- Able v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1995-01-03· cited 179×
- Perpich v. Department of DefenseSupreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 167×
- United States v. MiddletonUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1981-01-05· cited 162×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.