Eiden v. McCarthy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that “[s]ervice on [a] defendant . . . through the Attorney General . . . is insufficient to subject her to suit in her individual capacity”
• deeming fact in movant’s Rule 56(a) Statement “admitted” where plaintiff’s denial “contain[ed] no citation whatsoever”
• “With regard to Paragraphs 17, 18, 76, 77, 80, and 81 of the Defendants’ Local Rule 56(a)(1
• concluding that “[s]ervice on [a] defendant . . . through the Attorney General . . . is insufficient to subject her to suit in her individual capacity”
• “The purpose of the Rule 56 Statements is to help the court determine the facts of a case, whereas the parties’ legal arguments are properly submitted in the memoranda of law.”
• “The purpose of the Rule 56 Statements is to help the court determine the facts of a case, whereas the parties' legal arguments are properly submitted in the memoranda of law.“

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).