· 6/9/2000
Zuern v. Tate
Citations
- 101 F. Supp. 2d 948
- 2000 WL 759056
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that testimony regarding defendant’s blank expression was not a Doyle violation because Miranda warnings do not impliedly promise that expression or demeanor will not be used against a defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.