Zuern v. Tate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Congress intended by [§ 2254(d)(1)] to shield convictions which complied with federal law when entered from reversal by later habeas courts applying ‘new’ law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Theodore J. Lyons v. Clarice Stovall
  Sixth Circuit· 1999-08-24· cited 319×
• Smith v. Anderson
  S.D. Ohio· 2000-02-22· cited 36×
• Troy A. Ashmus v. Jeanne Woodford, Acting Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-01-24· cited 16×
• Henderson v. Collins
  S.D. Ohio· 1999-08-04· cited 14×
• Scott v. Anderson
  N.D. Ohio· 1997-03-07· cited 8×
• Griffin v. Endicott
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1996-09-13· cited 4×
• Mills v. Anderson
  S.D. Ohio· 1997-02-12· cited 4×
• Booth v. State of Maryland
  Fourth Circuit· 1997-04-21· cited 2×
• Wimberly v. McKune
  D. Kansas· 1997-04-16· cited 2×
• Williams v. Cain
  W.D. Louisiana· 1996-10-09· cited 2×