S.D. Ohio· 3/4/2009
Sheppard v. Bagley
Citations
- 604 F. Supp. 2d 1003
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21290
- 2009 WL 545317
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying Lundgren to prosecutor’s improper comments in closing arguments
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gregory L. Frost
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
184 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court· 2000-04-26· cited 41,291×
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court· 1986-01-27· cited 28,671×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 15,929×
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 12,560×
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court· 1991-12-04· cited 8,719×
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court· 1995-01-23· cited 7,671×
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 7,499×
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court· 1999-06-07· cited 6,799×
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court· 1977-06-23· cited 6,068×
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 5,961×
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court· 1982-03-08· cited 5,808×
- United States v. FradySupreme Court· 1982-05-24· cited 5,791×
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,124×
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 4,818×
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court· 1985-02-20· cited 4,689×
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 4,617×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.