· 6/6/2002
Bates v. Tesar
Citations
- 81 S.W.3d 411
- 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 4130
- 2002 WL 1303019
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that when a parent relocates a “significant distance” away, a finding of changed circumstances may be appropriate
- finding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in establishing a geographic residency restriction
- noting that principle of res judicata is recognized in the family code’s requirement that a party attempting to modify existing custody order must show circumstances have materially and substantially changed since the time of the prior order
- including Holley factors in list of factors to ascertain best interest of child in parental relocation context
- listing additional factors courts of other jurisdictions have considered in the specific context of relocation litigation
- including Holley factors in list of factors to ascertain best interest of child in parental relocation context
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McClure
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.