Skip to main content
· 6/6/2002

Bates v. Tesar

Citations

  • 81 S.W.3d 411
  • 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 4130
  • 2002 WL 1303019

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that when a parent relocates a “significant distance” away, a finding of changed circumstances may be appropriate
  • finding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in establishing a geographic residency restriction
  • noting that principle of res judicata is recognized in the family code’s requirement that a party attempting to modify existing custody order must show circumstances have materially and substantially changed since the time of the prior order
  • including Holley factors in list of factors to ascertain best interest of child in parental relocation context
  • listing additional factors courts of other jurisdictions have considered in the specific context of relocation litigation
  • including Holley factors in list of factors to ascertain best interest of child in parental relocation context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McClure

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.