Cherne Industries, Inc. v. Magallanes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that compliance with rules 296 and 297 is sufficient to preserve error for unfiled findings
• concluding that harm was not negated since the evidence supporting the court’s determination was mixed
• recognizing that the court’s duty to make findings under Rule 297 is “mandatory”
• recognizing trial court's duty to make findings and conclusions is mandatory when they are timely requested by a party
• holding a trial court’s duty to file findings of facts and conclusions of law is mandatory when all requests have been properly made
• recognizing trial court's duty to make findings and conclusions is mandatory when they are timely requested by a party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).