Zedan v. Habash

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “as long as the statutory scheme is coherent and consistent, there generally is no need for a court to inquire beyond the plain language of the stat- ute”
• “We have consistently explained that the final disposition of any adversary proceeding falls within our jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ross-Tousey v. Neary
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-12-17· cited 78×
• Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif
  Seventh Circuit· 2013-08-21· cited 69×
• Tidwell v. Smith (In Re Smith)
  Seventh Circuit· 2009-09-23· cited 60×
• United States v. Peel
  Seventh Circuit· 2010-02-12· cited 35×
• Lardas v. Grcic
  Seventh Circuit· 2017-02-03· cited 34×
• In Re Willett
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-09-12· cited 24×
• In Re Gray
  E.D. Michigan· 2011-03-15· cited 21×
• Skavysh v. Katsman (In Re Katsman)
  Seventh Circuit· 2014-11-19· cited 21×
• Rice, Heitman & Davis, S.C. v. Sasse (In Re Sasse)
  W.D. Wisconsin· 2010-08-13· cited 20×
• 421 Chestnut Partners, LP v. Aloia (In re Aloia)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-07-17· cited 18×
• In RE McKINNEY
  Seventh Circuit· 2010-06-23· cited 17×
• BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Carol Anderson
  Seventh Circuit· 2019-02-26· cited 14×
• In Re Solis
  Seventh Circuit· 2010-07-09· cited 11×
• Schaumburg Bank &Trust Company v. Richard S. Alsterda
  Seventh Circuit· 2016-03-04· cited 11×
• Stearns v. Pratola (In re Pratola)
  E.D. Illinois· 2018-08-31· cited 10×
• In re Peake
  N.D. Illinois· 2018-08-15· cited 8×
• Kelly v. Herrell
  Seventh Circuit· 2015-03-03· cited 8×
• In Re Roderick
  E.D. California· 2010-03-08· cited 6×
• Ruhl v. HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc.
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2008-12-23· cited 5×
• Cervac v. Littman (In re Littman)
  N.D. Illinois· 2015-08-18· cited 5×

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
• Lamie v. United States Trustee
  Supreme Court· 2004-01-26· cited 1,956×
• Kontrick v. Ryan
  Supreme Court· 2004-01-14· cited 1,543×
• Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.
  Supreme Court· 1988-05-23· cited 1,283×
• In the Matter of Richard C. Scarlata, Debtor. Goldberg Securities, Inc. v. Richard C. Scarlata, Debtor-Appellee
  Seventh Circuit· 1993-03-26· cited 245×
• In the Matter of Nancy S. Marchiando, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of State of Illinois, Department of the Lottery
  Seventh Circuit· 1994-01-10· cited 236×
• Salem, Maurice J. v. Neshewat, Michael
  Seventh Circuit· 2006-10-10· cited 153×
• Village of San Jose, a Municipal Corporation v. Daniel L. McWilliams and Ida M. McWilliams Debtors-Appellees
  Seventh Circuit· 2002-03-27· cited 135×
• In the Matter of MORSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., Debtor. Appeal of HOOSIER FENCE COMPANY, INC.
  Seventh Circuit· 1986-11-04· cited 117×
• In Re: Joseph H. Golant, Debtor. Joseph H. Golant v. Abraham Levy
  Seventh Circuit· 2001-02-12· cited 100×
• In the Matter of Forty-Eight Insulations, Incorporated, Debtor. Appeal of Maritime Asbestos 1
  Seventh Circuit· 1997-06-09· cited 86×
• In Re: Rimsat, Limited, Debtor, Appeals Of: Kauthar Sdn Bhd
  Seventh Circuit· 2000-05-18· cited 85×
• In the Matter of Martin Szekely and Donna Szekely, Debtors-Appellants
  Seventh Circuit· 1991-07-02· cited 57×
• Bank of America, N.A., Creditor-Appellant v. Alex D. Moglia, Trustee-Appellee
  Seventh Circuit· 2003-06-02· cited 55×
• In the Matter of Francisco Lopez, Debtor-Appellant
  Seventh Circuit· 1997-06-27· cited 50×
• In Re: Consolidated Industries Corp., Debtor. Enodis Corporation v. Employers Insurance of Wausau
  Seventh Circuit· 2004-03-09· cited 47×
• Riggsby v. Riggsby
  Seventh Circuit· 1984-10-15· cited 39×
• Mid-Tech Consulting, Inc. v. Swendra
  Eighth Circuit· 1991-07-11· cited 38×
• In Re Claude Emery, Debtor. Citibank, N.A. v. Claude Emery
  Second Circuit· 1998-01-05· cited 31×
• Bart Harrison Dye, Debtor-Appellant v. United States of America, Farm Services Agency (Fsa), Creditor-Appellee. In Re: Bart Harrison Dye, Debtor
  Seventh Circuit· 2004-03-10· cited 29×