Schaumburg Bank &Trust Company v. Richard S. Alsterda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that unsolicited opinions from EMA are treated as any other expert opinion, and not accorded a presumption of correctness
• holding EMA’s opinion beyond scope of inquiry was admissible but not presumptively correct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).