Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 7/11/1991

Mid-Tech Consulting, Inc. v. Swendra

Citations

  • 938 F.2d 885
  • 1991 WL 124461

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a majority of courts have held that notice of a possible fraud prior to discharge is sufficient to deny a request to revoke a discharge
  • stating that a majority of courts, including bankruptcy courts in the Southern District of New York, have held that notice of a possible fraud prior to discharge is sufficient to deny a request to revoke a discharge
  • “[T]he burden is on the creditor to investigate diligently any possibly fraudulent conduct before discharge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Battey, Magill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.