Ross-Tousey v. Neary

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the deadline for filing a motion to dismiss under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code was not jurisdictional
• concluding that the deadline for filing a motion to dismiss under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code was not jurisdictional
• noting that “it is difficult to square this part of section 707(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I) with the IRM approach, which would only allow the vehicle ownership deduction on condition of a monthly debt payment.”
• determining that the district court’s remand order and the 25 bankruptcy court’s order denying the U.S. Trustee’s motion to 26 dismiss under § 707(b)(2) and (b)(3)(B) were final
• stating that despite a ruling that allowed the debtor to take a deduction that reduced the debtor's income below the presumptively-abusive level under the means test, the trustee could still seek dismissal for abuse under section 707(b)(3)
• “Finality does not require the termination of the 2Indeed,the text of 28 U.S.C. § 158(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).