Zamakshari v. Dvoskin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that hearing officer’s alleged denial of a potential witness’s testimony was harmless where the “testimony would most likely have made little or no difference” to the outcome of the hearing
• dismissing the plaintiff's procedural due 8 process claim where he was confined to SHU for 60 days

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).