Larry Whitford v. Captain Boglino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a prisoner “has no federal due process right to a prehearing investigation . . . .”
• CAB that relies on testimony of confidential informant must in some way document reliability of informant
• “the district court may, in its discretion, allow a party to renew a previously denied summary judgment motion or file successive motions, particularly if good reasons exist.”
• “[T]he district court may, in its discretion, allow a party to renew a previously denied summary judgment motion or file successive motions, particularly if good reasons exist.”
• inmates do not have any “federal due process right to a prehearing 17 investigation”
• “A prisoner has no due process right to be housed in any particular facility.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).