Seventh Circuit· 7/5/2023
Zailey Hess v. Jamie Garcia
Citations
- 72 F.4th 753
Oral argument
- ListenArgued33 min recording
Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding defendant’s inappropriate remarks made to plaintiff were sufficient to “support an inference” that defendant intended to harass plaintiff based on the plaintiff’s sex
- determining that sexual assault by a public official shocked the conscience
- determining that sexual assault by a public official shocked the conscience
- referring to the Fourth Amendment, due process, and equal protection as different theories to support a claim of sexual assault against a police officer
- collecting cases finding similarly in the First, Fifth, Second, Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth Circuits
- police officer’s repeated sexual assault of minor student during class-required police car ride-along could be found to shock the conscience
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Other cases named Zailey Hess v. Jamie Garcia
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.