Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 7/5/2023

Zailey Hess v. Jamie Garcia

Citations

  • 72 F.4th 753

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding defendant’s inappropriate remarks made to plaintiff were sufficient to “support an inference” that defendant intended to harass plaintiff based on the plaintiff’s sex
  • determining that sexual assault by a public official shocked the conscience
  • determining that sexual assault by a public official shocked the conscience
  • referring to the Fourth Amendment, due process, and equal protection as different theories to support a claim of sexual assault against a police officer
  • collecting cases finding similarly in the First, Fifth, Second, Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth Circuits
  • police officer’s repeated sexual assault of minor student during class-required police car ride-along could be found to shock the conscience

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Other cases named Zailey Hess v. Jamie Garcia

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.