Collins v. City of Harker Heights

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Due Process Clause does not guarantee municipal employees a workplace that is free from unreasonable risks of harm
• holding that alleged omission by city could not “properly be characterized as arbitrary, or conscience-shocking, in a constitutional sense”
• holding that only the “most egregious official conduct can be said to be arbitrary in the constitutional sense”
• holding that the city’s alleged failure to provide a safe place to work did not constitute a substantive due process violation
• holding that § 1983 does not provide a remedy if there is no violation of federal law
• holding that § 1983 does not provide a remedy if there is no violation of federal law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).