Yount v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that where genuine issues of material fact exist regarding 24 the alleged constitutional violation, “summary judgment is appropriate only if Defendants are 25 entitled to qualified immunity on the facts as alleged by the non-moving party”
• reviewing the government’s failure to disclose material information pursuant to Rule 16 for harmless error
• “Individuals in their personal capacities [] are not subject to suit under Title II [of the ADA], which provides redress only from public entities.”
• “Judges are not like pigs, hunting for truffles buried in briefs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).