David W. Heisig v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the same precedents should apply to our Court and district courts in this area
• holding that the same precedents should apply to our Court and district courts in this area
• holding that court may disagree with correction board’s decision but cannot substitute its judgment where “reasonable minds” could reach differing results on facts presented
• holding that the same precedents should apply to our Court and district courts in this area
• holding that the same evi-dentiary and decisional principles apply to district courts and the Court of Federal Claims in addressing cases involving military pay and benefits
• holding that to successfully challenge a decision by a military correction board, the plaintiff must point to substantial evidence showing that the board’s conclusions were unsupported by the evidence or were contrary to law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).