Kirwin v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “gross statistical disparities” alone will 24 rarely be “sufficient to invalidate a challenged government action”
• “Inquiring whether the court has jurisdiction is a federal 24 judge’s first duty in every case.”
• Batson inquiry was properly conducted where “the transcript of 24 jury voir dire itself illuminate[d] the prosecutor’s actual reasons”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).