Froudi v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Following trial, the parties will have the opportunity to argue objections on paper before the trial record is officially closed, and before post-trial briefing begins.”
• mere fact that claim is valued at $40,000 does not change nature of the relief sought from equitable to a money judgment
• “A motion for reconsideration is not intended to allow a party to make arguments already presented to, and rejected by, the court.” (cleaned up)
• “Generally, a motion for reconsideration is not a vehicle for giving an unhappy litigant an additional chance to sway the judge, nor is it intended to allow a party to make arguments already presented to, and rejected by, the court.”
• “[A] motion for reconsideration is not a vehicle for giving an unhappy litigant an additional chance to sway the judge, nor is it intended to allow a party to make arguments already presented to, and rejected by, the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Froudi v. United States

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Froudi v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1991-06-13· cited 4×
• Froudi v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1991-02-05· cited 1×