Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Claims· 1/14/1991

Froudi v. United States

Citations

  • 22 Cl. Ct. 290
  • 1991 U.S. Claims LEXIS 20
  • 1991 WL 3154

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Following trial, the parties will have the opportunity to argue objections on paper before the trial record is officially closed, and before post-trial briefing begins.”
  • mere fact that claim is valued at $40,000 does not change nature of the relief sought from equitable to a money judgment
  • “A motion for reconsideration is not intended to allow a party to make arguments already presented to, and rejected by, the court.” (cleaned up)
  • “Generally, a motion for reconsideration is not a vehicle for giving an unhappy litigant an additional chance to sway the judge, nor is it intended to allow a party to make arguments already presented to, and rejected by, the court.”
  • “[A] motion for reconsideration is not a vehicle for giving an unhappy litigant an additional chance to sway the judge, nor is it intended to allow a party to make arguments already presented to, and rejected by, the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Froudi v. United States

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.