S.D. Ohio· 4/26/2002
Yates v. Applied Performance Technologies, Inc.
Citations
- 209 F.R.D. 143
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19283
- 2002 WL 1577821
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- granting in part motion to strike opposing memorandum, but limited to portion of memorandum referencing deposition testimony “subject to an Agreed Protective Order . . . and . . . designated as confidential”
- “In the Court's view, Lucent's third party complaint, which names Gregg McConnell as a third party defendant, places Ferron in an untenable situation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marbley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court· 1985-06-17· cited 814×
- Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Elliott Travel & Tours, Inc. And Jared SchubinerSixth Circuit· 1991-08-22· cited 292×
- Panduit Corp. v. All States Plastic Manufacturing Co., Inc.Federal Circuit· 1984-09-25· cited 279×
- Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.Seventh Circuit· 1982-11-09· cited 277×
- Ex Parte BurrSupreme Court· 1824-03-17· cited 261×
- Fegley v. HigginsSixth Circuit· 1994-04-26· cited 149×
- Sales v. MarshallSixth Circuit· 1989-04-21· cited 129×
- Soberay MacHine & Equipment Company, (96-3946 97-3308)/cross-Appellee v. Mrf Limited, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant (96-3997)Sixth Circuit· 1999-07-07· cited 127×
- General Mill Supply Company, Manual Rotenberg and Milton Rotenberg, Plaintiffs v. Sca Services, Inc., Hale and DorrSixth Circuit· 1983-03-14· cited 96×
- Manning v. Waring, Cox, James, Sklar & AllenSixth Circuit· 1988-06-09· cited 57×
- Kitchen v. Aristech ChemicalS.D. Ohio· 1991-08-02· cited 54×
- Bedel v. ThompsonS.D. Ohio· 1984-07-20· cited 41×
- Unnamed caseSixth Circuit· 1987-08-13· cited 33×
- Hamrick v. UNION TP., OHIOS.D. Ohio· 2000-01-12· cited 12×
- Nilavar v. Mercy Health System-Western OhioS.D. Ohio· 2001-02-20· cited 11×
- Intercept Security Corp. v. Code-Alarm, Inc.E.D. Michigan· 1995-10-23· cited 9×
- Canjura v. Able Service Contractors, Inc.D. Maryland· 1994-10-28· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.