Skip to main content
· 9/25/1984

Panduit Corp. v. All States Plastic Manufacturing Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 744 F.2d 1564
  • 223 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 465
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 15191

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that disqualification is among the “procedural matters, that are not unique to patent issues
  • A court must maintain “the delicate balance” between the need to uphold ethical standards and an individuals’s right to counsel of his choice
  • A court must maintain “the delicate balance” between the need to uphold ethical standards and an individuals’s right to counsel of his choice
  • “Presumptions of fact have been created to assist in certain circumstances where direct proof of a matter is for one reason or another rendered difficult.”
  • “motions for attorney disqualification should be reviewed with extreme caution for they can be misused as techniques of harassment”
  • “[T]he Federal Circuit shall review procedural matters, that are not unique to patent issues, under the law of the particular regional circuit court . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kashiwa, Miller, Nies, Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.