Court of Appeals of Washington· 8/12/2014
Caruso v. Wixom
Citations
- 182 Wash. App. 881
- 332 P.3d 1063
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- listing federal cases where courts disqualified counsel for conflicts of interest
- “No principle of law excuses an attorney from a conflict with a client because a court may later issue a ruling that renders the conflict moot.”
- “‘The lawyer’s interest,’ within the context of RPC 1.7, denotes a financial or familial interest or an 4 interest arising from the lawyer’s exposure to culpability.” (citing Stenson)
- resolving a conflict of interest sua sponte on appeal
- resolving a conflict of interest sua sponte on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fearing
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re the Marriage of Richard Todd Wixom & Linda Buchholz WixomCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-10-22· cited 41×
- Friends of North Spokane County Parks v. Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-10-21· cited 9×
- Litster Frost v. Idaho Injury Law GroupIdaho Supreme Court· 2022-09-02· cited 7×
- Richard Plein, Et Ano, Resps v. Usaa Casualty Ins Co., PetCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2019-07-29· cited 4×
- In re Dependency of E.M.Washington Supreme Court· 2021-04-15· cited 1×
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-06-30· cited 1,962×
- In Re Personal Restraint of StensonWashington Supreme Court· 2001-01-04· cited 191×
- In Re RubenSixth Circuit· 1987-07-30· cited 182×
- In re the Personal Restraint of StensonWashington Supreme Court· 2001-01-04· cited 175×
- John A. Healey, Michael S. Press v. Chelsea Resources, Ltd., Dominick & Dominick Securities, Inc. And Dominick & Dominick, IncorporatedSecond Circuit· 1991-10-18· cited 163×
- United States v. Dolan, John E.Third Circuit· 1978-01-23· cited 149×
- Eriks v. DenverWashington Supreme Court· 1992-02-20· cited 138×
- Universal Athletic Sales Co., a Corporation v. American Gym, Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation, Inc.Third Circuit· 1976-12-30· cited 133×
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-12-19· cited 115×
- Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkE.D. New York· 1986-05-23· cited 99×
- MacArthur v. Bank of New YorkS.D. New York· 1981-10-28· cited 73×
- In Re Chou-Chen Chemicals, Inc.W.D. Kentucky· 1983-07-19· cited 59×
- United States v. Reuben Coleman, and Milton R. PerryFifth Circuit· 1993-08-26· cited 55×
- James O'COnnOr v. Jim Jones, Superintendent, Missouri Training Center for Men, Dr. Chung, FCC Medical, Avery Hutcheson, Sheriff of Mississippi CountyEighth Circuit· 1991-10-17· cited 33×
- Cramer v. ChilesS.D. Florida· 1999-01-08· cited 28×
- Anschutz Petroleum Marketing Corp. v. E.W. Saybolt & Co.S.D. New York· 1986-04-22· cited 28×
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Sierra Resources, Inc.D. Colorado· 1987-11-16· cited 23×
- Kalmanovitz v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc.D. Delaware· 1985-06-03· cited 22×
- Stratagem Development Corp. v. Heron International N.V.S.D. New York· 1991-01-31· cited 22×
- Disciplinary Proceeding Against CarpenterWashington Supreme Court· 2007-04-12· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.