S.D. Ohio· 8/2/1991
Kitchen v. Aristech Chemical
Citations
- 769 F. Supp. 254
- 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10857
- 1991 WL 152630
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that “the ability to deny one’s opponent the services of his chosen counsel is a potent weapon”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Herman J. Weber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McCallum v. CSX Transportation, Inc.M.D. North Carolina· 1993-05-04· cited 25×
- Brown v. St. Joseph CountyN.D. Indiana· 1993-04-12· cited 24×
- SST Castings, Inc. v. Amana Appliances, Inc.S.D. Ohio· 2002-10-18· cited 21×
- Mann v. University of CincinnatiS.D. Ohio· 1993-06-24· cited 16×
- Bartech Industries, Inc. v. International Baking Co.E.D. Tennessee· 1996-01-08· cited 15×
- Yates v. Applied Performance Technologies, Inc.S.D. Ohio· 2002-04-26· cited 15×
- Nuri v. PRC, INC.M.D. Alabama· 1998-05-08· cited 13×
- Hamrick v. UNION TP., OHIOS.D. Ohio· 2000-01-12· cited 12×
- Nilavar v. Mercy Health System-Western OhioS.D. Ohio· 2001-02-20· cited 11×
- Carnegie Companies, Inc. v. Summit Properties, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2009-09-09· cited 10×
- White Family Companies, Inc. v. Dayton Title Agency, Inc.S.D. Ohio· 2002-09-27· cited 8×
- Carlsen v. ThomasE.D. Kentucky· 1994-12-23· cited 8×
- Baker v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.N.D. Ohio· 1995-07-25· cited 7×
- S.D. Warren Co. v. Duff-NortonW.D. Michigan· 2004-01-06· cited 6×
- Insituform of North America, Inc. v. Midwest Pipeliners, Inc.S.D. Ohio· 1991-11-29· cited 6×
- Schorr v. Briarwood Estates Ltd. PartnershipN.D. Ohio· 1998-03-30· cited 6×
- Damron v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2009-07-24· cited 5×
- Hamrick v. UNION TP., OHIOS.D. Ohio· 1999-12-22· cited 4×
- In Re Employment Discrimination Litigation AlM.D. Alabama· 2001-07-09· cited 3×
- Dynasty Apparel Industries Inc. v. RentzS.D. Ohio· 2001-11-28· cited 3×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court· 1985-06-17· cited 814×
- In Re SnyderSupreme Court· 1985-06-24· cited 385×
- Panduit Corp. v. All States Plastic Manufacturing Co., Inc.Federal Circuit· 1984-09-25· cited 279×
- Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.Seventh Circuit· 1982-11-09· cited 277×
- Ex Parte BurrSupreme Court· 1824-03-17· cited 261×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,745 Dean Woods, and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Covington County Bank, Edward Hoglund v. Covington County BankFifth Circuit· 1976-08-11· cited 242×
- United States v. Roy W. CollinsTenth Circuit· 1990-11-27· cited 221×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,675 James M. Richardson v. Hamilton International CorporationThird Circuit· 1972-11-17· cited 166×
- W. T. Grant Company v. Mark S. Haines, and John A. ChristensenSecond Circuit· 1976-03-09· cited 128×
- United States v. Nathan George DinitzFifth Circuit· 1976-09-20· cited 125×
- United States v. Louis Leonard Kitchin, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1979-04-09· cited 98×
- United States v. Russell HobsonEleventh Circuit· 1982-03-24· cited 97×
- General Mill Supply Company, Manual Rotenberg and Milton Rotenberg, Plaintiffs v. Sca Services, Inc., Hale and DorrSixth Circuit· 1983-03-14· cited 96×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1981-11-23· cited 71×
- United States v. Kenneth Joseph MasatFifth Circuit· 1990-02-28· cited 70×
- Polycast Technology Corp. v. Uniroyal, Inc.S.D. New York· 1990-02-13· cited 60×
- Manning v. Waring, Cox, James, Sklar & AllenSixth Circuit· 1988-06-09· cited 57×
- General Electric Company v. The Valeron CorporationSixth Circuit· 1979-10-30· cited 54×
- Jerry Michael Gordon v. Doug Norman, Harold Prows, Ken Martin (85-5175), and J. Anderson (85-5186)Sixth Circuit· 1986-04-23· cited 48×
- Melamed v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Sixth Circuit· 1979-01-24· cited 48×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.