Ninth Circuit· 1/31/1984
Wrighten v. Metropolitan Hospitals, Inc.
Citations
- 726 F.2d 1346
- 33 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1714
- 38 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 705
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 25921
- 33 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 34,137
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the district court correctly found that issuance of right-to-sue letters after filing of federal claim cured any jurisdictional defect, but stating that “[p]remature suits are always subject to a motion to dismiss and there was none here.”
- addressing the claim of a hospital employee that opposed the mistreatment of black patients
- subsequent issuance of right to sue letters cured any jurisdictional defects in absence of prejudice and any motion to dismiss and there being no effect on state’s ability to perform administrative function
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goodwin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Clement SUMNER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1990-03-28· cited 551×
- Bonds v. LeavittFourth Circuit· 2011-01-03· cited 372×
- Parviz Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police DepartmentNinth Circuit· 1988-02-16· cited 357×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hacienda HotelNinth Circuit· 1989-08-10· cited 206×
- Diane MILLER and Pamela Lewis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FAIRCHILD INDUSTRIES, INC., a Maryland Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1989-09-19· cited 188×
- Sharon Puckett, Cross-Appellee v. Tennessee Eastman Company, Cross-AppellantSixth Circuit· 1989-11-07· cited 187×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1994-09-27· cited 165×
- Flait v. North American Watch Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1992-02-06· cited 165×
- Maureen Little v. Windermere Relocation, Inc., a Washington CorporationNinth Circuit· 2002-01-23· cited 156×
- Greenwood v. RossEighth Circuit· 1985-11-22· cited 155×
- The Association Of Mexican-American Educators v. State Of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 2000-10-30· cited 146×
- Dennis v. O'Day v. McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Company, a Foreign Corporation, (Two Cases)Ninth Circuit· 1996-03-26· cited 145×
- Walter W. GRANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HAZELETT STRIP-CASTING CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1989-07-26· cited 126×
- Robert E. Hill v. Jack E. Potter, Postmaster GeneralSeventh Circuit· 2003-12-18· cited 116×
- Joanne Beaule Ruggles v. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, Civ. A. No. 84-6223Ninth Circuit· 1986-10-28· cited 110×
- Karen L. Edwards v. Occidental Chemical CorporationNinth Circuit· 1990-01-09· cited 107×
- State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court· 2002-03-13· cited 70×
- Lisa M. Jones, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus Curiae v. American State BankEighth Circuit· 1988-09-21· cited 63×
- Robert MacKowiak v. University Nuclear Systems, Inc., and Secretary, U.S. Department of LaborNinth Circuit· 1984-06-22· cited 52×
- Jamison v. Rockaway Tp. Bd. of Educ.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-07-11· cited 51×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.