· 12/18/2003
Robert E. Hill v. Jack E. Potter, Postmaster General
Citations
- 352 F.3d 1142
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 25612
- 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,604
- 93 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 188
- 2003 WL 22966239
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a failure to cooperate with the EEOC constitutes failure to exhaust administrative remedies
- “[L]oss of a bonus is not an adverse employment action ... where the employee is not automatically entitled to the bonus.”
- “What is true is that a litigant is not permitted to obtain an immediate appeal of an interlocutory order by the facile expedient of dis- missing one of his claims without prejudice so that he can con- tinue with the case after the appeal is decided.”
- “failure to exhaust is not a jurisdictional defect”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Easterbrook, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.