Skip to main content
· 2/6/1992

Flait v. North American Watch Corp.

Citations

  • 3 Cal. App. 4th 467
  • 4 Cal. Rptr. 2d 522
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 1843
  • 1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 134
  • 63 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 785

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that one crucial issue in a retaliatory termination claim is the reasonableness of the employee’s belief that he was opposing unlawful activity
  • noting that “[l]awsuits claiming retaliatory employment termination . . . are analogous to federal Title VII claims, and are evaluated under federal law interpreting Title VII cases”
  • finding nexus established where employee “was terminated only a few months after” he engaged in protected activity
  • reversing judgment for employer on motion for summary adjudication where circumstantial evidence of causal link raised issue of fact
  • “ ‘[I]t is good faith and reasonableness, not the fact of discrimination, that is the critical inquiry in a retaliation case.’ ”
  • sufficient causal link where supervisor who terminated employee had made sexist com-meats to another employee and fired employee five months after a confrontation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boren

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.