D. Kansas· 4/22/1997
Wright v. Wyandotte County Sheriff's Department
Citations
- 963 F. Supp. 1029
- 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6161
- 75 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 752
- 1997 WL 219889
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that plaintiff’s subjective feeling and “mere conjecture” that her employer had discriminated against her were insufficient to avoid summary judgment
- finding that the plaintiff improperly sued the county sheriff’s department, which is “merely an agency of the county . . . and is not itself capable of being sued.”
- dismissing a § 1983 claim against a Kansas county sheriff’s office for the same reason
- dismissing a § 1983 claim against a Kansas county sheriff’s office on the same ground
- “Mere disagreement with an employer’s adverse employment actions is not sufficient to establish pretext.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Van Bebber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Fugate v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas CityD. Kansas· 2001-08-08· cited 12×
- Arceo v. City of Junction City, KansasD. Kansas· 2002-01-17· cited 10×
- Rawlins-Roa v. United Way of Wyandotte County, Inc.D. Kansas· 1997-08-04· cited 4×
- Whayne v. StateD. Kansas· 1997-09-25· cited 1×
- Whane v. State of Kan.D. Kansas· 1997-09-25
- Ellison v. Sandia National LaboratoriesD. New Mexico· 2002-01-28
- Rudkin v. Sedgwick County, Kan.D. Kansas· 2007-01-10
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court· 1962-12-03· cited 17,205×
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 15,585×
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court· 1993-06-25· cited 8,844×
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-02-24· cited 2,939×
- City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court· 1978-04-25· cited 734×
- Ofelia Randle v. City of AuroraTenth Circuit· 1995-10-26· cited 626×
- Sharon G. CONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, a Colorado Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeTenth Circuit· 1994-01-20· cited 448×
- Branson v. Price River Coal Co.Tenth Circuit· 1988-04-18· cited 399×
- Belinda MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NANNIE AND THE NEWBORNS, INC.; Business Solutions, Inc.; Larry D. Gudgel, Defendants-AppelleesTenth Circuit· 1993-08-31· cited 398×
- Daniel Howard Bee v. Dr. Keith Greaves, Medic Keith Hughes and Dr. Robert GreerTenth Circuit· 1984-09-24· cited 374×
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FLASHER COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeTenth Circuit· 1992-12-29· cited 372×
- Jewel BURRUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED TELEPHONE COMPANY OF KANSAS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeTenth Circuit· 1982-07-22· cited 365×
- James L. Bolden, Jr. v. Prc Inc., Formerly Known as Planning Research Corporation, and Robert CarverTenth Circuit· 1995-01-31· cited 333×
- Sauers v. Salt Lake CountyTenth Circuit· 1993-08-09· cited 319×
- Gerald Marx v. Schnuck Markets, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1996-02-07· cited 218×
- Alvin Rea, Gordon Keepers, Robert Reynolds, Barbara Weightman, and Barbara Van Den Arend v. Martin Marietta CorporationTenth Circuit· 1994-06-20· cited 214×
- Greene v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1996-10-15· cited 179×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.