Skip to main content
· 8/31/1993

Belinda MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NANNIE AND THE NEWBORNS, INC.; Business Solutions, Inc.; Larry D. Gudgel, Defendants-Appellees

Citations

  • 3 F.3d 1410
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 22015
  • 62 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,533
  • 62 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1275
  • 1993 WL 328186

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the plaintiff’s failure to rebut the employer’s legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for her termination was not relevant to a hostile work environment claim
  • concluding that the plaintiff's failure to rebut the employer's legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for her termination was not relevant to a hostile work environment claim
  • stating that plaintiffs quid pro quo claim is one for wrongful termination and using the elements for a wrongful termination claim
  • finding first Berry factor to be satisfied where “all the incidents alleged by the plaintiff involved sexual harassment”
  • applying continuing violation theory despite the fact that sexual harassment, including an incident of rape, continued for a long time before plaintiff filed with the EEOC
  • non-moving party cannot rest on the mere allegations in the pleadings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Kelly, Barrett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.