Federal Claims· 4/7/2008
Wright v. United States
Citations
- 81 Fed. Cl. 369
- 2008 U.S. Claims LEXIS 96
- 2008 WL 963008
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]t is a canon of military-pay jurisprudence that seeking permissive administrative review does not toll the statute of limitations in the Tucker Act.”
- “[I]t is a canon of military-pay jurisprudence that seeking permissive administrative review does not toll the statute of limitations in the Tucker Act.”
- “Twombly discredits not only Conley, but the venerable Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Christine, Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Peterson v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2012-03-29· cited 16×
- Freeman v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2011-04-21· cited 11×
- Crusan v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2009-03-24· cited 9×
- Grooms v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2013-01-07· cited 8×
- Gay v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2010-07-27· cited 6×
- House v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2011-07-08· cited 4×
- Dubsky v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2011-06-16· cited 2×
- Richard R. Grooms v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2014-01-07
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court· 1972-02-22· cited 26,103×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court· 1976-05-03· cited 3,918×
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court· 1980-11-10· cited 3,527×
- Fisher v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2005-03-09· cited 1,462×
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 1995-07-12· cited 1,186×
- Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2003-06-17· cited 717×
- Donna Kelley v. Secretary, U.S. Department of LaborFederal Circuit· 1987-02-26· cited 570×
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2008-01-08· cited 519×
- McZeal v. Sprint Nextel Corp.Federal Circuit· 2007-09-14· cited 385×
- Jimmie Ann Taylor, Ladell Vasicek, Noma Chriss, Martha Cole, and Sara M. McCarthy v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2002-09-12· cited 364×
- Greenlee County, Arizona v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2007-05-14· cited 350×
- Metz v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2006-09-18· cited 222×
- 55 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1675, 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,952 Julio M. Cruz v. Department of the NavyFederal Circuit· 1991-04-30· cited 194×
- Louis G. Ruderer v. The United StatesCourt of Claims· 1969-07-16· cited 191×
- Brighton Village Associates, Herbert F. Gold, Juan M. Cofield, James E. Cofield, Jr., Trustee, and Herbert F. Gold, Trustee v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 1995-04-21· cited 87×
- Robert F. Christian, II v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2003-07-29· cited 65×
- Robert G. Smith v. Secretary of the Army, and Army Board for Correction of Military RecordsFederal Circuit· 2004-09-17· cited 63×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.