Louis G. Ruderer v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• expressing approval of stretching court’s “proper role in adversary proceedings to the limit”
• “[W]e have strained our proper role in adversary proceedings to the limit, searching this lengthy record to see if plaintiff has a cause of action somewhere displayed.”
• review of military discharge where pro se plaintiffs evidence and pleadings were somewhat unclear, irrational and not always “in his own best interests”
• The United States Court of Federal Claims has a long tradition of examining the record “to see if [a pro se ] plaintiff has a cause of action somewhere displayed.”
• “As often with pro se plaintiffs, we have strained our proper role in adversary proceedings to the limit, searching this lengthy record to see if plaintiff has a cause of action somewhere displayed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).