Greenlee County, Arizona v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that \issues related to class certification were moot in light of our resolution against the plaintiff of a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment\
• recognizing that \issues related to class certification were moot in light of our resolution against the plaintiff of a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment\
• recognizing that courts can grant a motion to dismiss without addressing class certification
• finding that the relevant statute was “reasonably amenable” to a money-mandating interpretation because it provided that “the Secretary of the Interior shall make a payment ...”
• finding the Court of Federal Claims had subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiff had established it was a “unit of local government” within the meaning of the money-mandating statute pertinent in that case, i.e., the Payment in Lieu of Taxes Act
• “[I]ssues related to class certification were moot in light of [a] resolution against a plaintiff of a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).